Paper detail

Threshold Rates of Codes Ensembles: Linear is Best

In this work, we prove new results concerning the combinatorial properties of random linear codes. Firstly, we prove a lower bound on the list-size required for random linear codes over $\mathbb F_q$ $\varepsilon$-close to capacity to list-recover with error radius $ρ$ and input lists of size $\ell$. We show that the list-size $L$ must be at least $\frac{\log_q\binom{q}{\ell}-R}{\varepsilon}$, where $R$ is the rate of the random linear code. As a comparison, we also pin down the list size of random codes which is $\frac{\log_q\binom{q}{\ell}}{\varepsilon}$. This leaves open the possibility (that we consider likely) that random linear codes perform better than random codes for list-recoverability, which is in contrast to a recent gap shown for the case of list-recovery from erasures (Guruswami et al., IEEE TIT 2021B). Next, we consider list-decoding with constant list-sizes. Specifically, we obtain new lower bounds on the rate required for list-of-$3$ decodability of random linear codes over $\mathbb F_2$; and list-of-$2$ decodability of random linear codes over $\mathbb F_q$ (for any $q$). This expands upon Guruswami et al. (IEEE TIT 2021A) which only studied list-of-$2$ decodability of random linear codes over $\mathbb F_2$. Further, in both cases we are able to show that the rate is larger than that which is possible for uniformly random codes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.