Paper detail

Threshold Decoding for Disjunctive Group Testing

Let $1 \le s < t$, $N \ge 1$ be integers and a complex electronic circuit of size $t$ is said to be an $s$-active, $\; s \ll t$, and can work as a system block if not more than $s$ elements of the circuit are defective. Otherwise, the circuit is said to be an $s$-defective and should be replaced by a similar $s$-active circuit. Suppose that there exists a possibility to run $N$ non-adaptive group tests to check the $s$-activity of the circuit. As usual, we say that a (disjunctive) group test yields the positive response if the group contains at least one defective element. Along with the conventional decoding algorithm based on disjunctive $s$-codes, we consider a threshold decision rule with the minimal possible decoding complexity, which is based on the simple comparison of a fixed threshold $T$, $1 \le T \le N - 1$, with the number of positive responses $p$, $0 \le p \le N$. For the both of decoding algorithms we discuss upper bounds on the $α$-level of significance of the statistical test for the null hypothesis $\left\{ H_0 \,:\, \text{the circuit is $s$-active} \right\}$ verse the alternative hypothesis $\left\{ H_1 \,:\, \text{the circuit is $s$-defective} \right\}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.