Paper detail

Three-Source Extractors for Polylogarithmic Min-Entropy

We continue the study of constructing explicit extractors for independent general weak random sources. The ultimate goal is to give a construction that matches what is given by the probabilistic method --- an extractor for two independent $n$-bit weak random sources with min-entropy as small as $\log n+O(1)$. Previously, the best known result in the two-source case is an extractor by Bourgain \cite{Bourgain05}, which works for min-entropy $0.49n$; and the best known result in the general case is an earlier work of the author \cite{Li13b}, which gives an extractor for a constant number of independent sources with min-entropy $\mathsf{polylog(n)}$. However, the constant in the construction of \cite{Li13b} depends on the hidden constant in the best known seeded extractor, and can be large; moreover the error in that construction is only $1/\mathsf{poly(n)}$. In this paper, we make two important improvements over the result in \cite{Li13b}. First, we construct an explicit extractor for \emph{three} independent sources on $n$ bits with min-entropy $k \geq \mathsf{polylog(n)}$. In fact, our extractor works for one independent source with poly-logarithmic min-entropy and another independent block source with two blocks each having poly-logarithmic min-entropy. Thus, our result is nearly optimal, and the next step would be to break the $0.49n$ barrier in two-source extractors. Second, we improve the error of the extractor from $1/\mathsf{poly(n)}$ to $2^{-k^{Ω(1)}}$, which is almost optimal and crucial for cryptographic applications. Some of the techniques developed here may be of independent interests.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.