Paper detail

Three-point correlation function of galaxy clusters in cosmological models: a strong dependence on triangle shape

In this paper, we use large $\pppm$ N-body simulations to study the three-point correlation function $ζ$ of clusters in two theoretical models. The first model (LCDM) is a low-density flat model of $Ω_0=0.3$, $Λ_0=0.7$ and $h=0.75$, and the second model (PIM) is an Einstein-de-Sitter model with its linear power spectrum obtained from observations. We found that the scaled function $Q(r,u,v)$, which is defined as the ratio of $ζ(r, ru, ru+rv)$ to the hierarchical sum $ξ(r)ξ(ru)+ ξ(ru) ξ(ru+rv) +ξ(ru+rv)ξ(r)$ (where $ξ$ is the two-point correlation function of clusters), depends weakly on $r$ and $u$, but very strongly on $v$. $Q(r,u,v)$ is about 0.2 at $v=0.1$ and 1.8 at $v=0.9$. A model of $Q(r,u,v)=Θ10^{1.3v^2}$ can fit the data of $ζ$ very nicely with $Θ\approx 0.14$. This model is found to be universal for the LCDM clusters and for the PIM clusters. Furthermore, $Q(r,u,v)$ is found to be insensitive to the cluster richness. We have compared our N-body results with simple analytical theories of cluster formation, like the peak theories or the local maxima theories. We found that these theories do not provide an adequate description for the three-point function of clusters. We have also examined the observational data of $ζ$ presently available, and have not found any contradiction between the observations and our model predictions. The $v$-dependence of $q$ in a projected catalogue of clusters is shown to be much weaker than the $v$-dependence of $Q$ found in the three-dimensional case. It would be important to search for the $v$-dependence of $Q$ in redshift samples of rich clusters.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.