Three-point correlation function of galaxy clusters in cosmological models: a strong dependence on triangle shape

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this paper, we use large $\pppm$ N-body simulations to study the three-point correlation function ζζ of clusters in two theoretical models. The first model (LCDM) is a low-density flat model of Ω0=0.3Ω_0=0.3, Λ0=0.7Λ_0=0.7 and h=0.75h=0.75, and the second model (PIM) is an Einstein-de-Sitter model with its linear power spectrum obtained from observations. We found that the scaled function Q(r,u,v)Q(r,u,v), which is defined as the ratio of ζ(r,ru,ru+rv)ζ(r, ru, ru+rv) to the hierarchical sum ξ(r)ξ(ru)+ξ(ru)ξ(ru+rv)+ξ(ru+rv)ξ(r)ξ(r)ξ(ru)+ ξ(ru) ξ(ru+rv) +ξ(ru+rv)ξ(r) (where ξξ is the two-point correlation function of clusters), depends weakly on rr and uu, but very strongly on vv. Q(r,u,v)Q(r,u,v) is about 0.2 at v=0.1v=0.1 and 1.8 at v=0.9v=0.9. A model of Q(r,u,v)=Θ101.3v2Q(r,u,v)=Θ10^{1.3v^2} can fit the data of ζζ very nicely with Θ≈0.14Θ\approx 0.14. This model is found to be universal for the LCDM clusters and for the PIM clusters. Furthermore, Q(r,u,v)Q(r,u,v) is found to be insensitive to the cluster richness. We have compared our N-body results with simple analytical theories of cluster formation, like the peak theories or the local maxima theories. We found that these theories do not provide an adequate description for the three-point function of clusters. We have also examined the observational data of ζζ presently available, and have not found any contradiction between the observations and our model predictions. The vv-dependence of qq in a projected catalogue of clusters is shown to be much weaker than the vv-dependence of QQ found in the three-dimensional case. It would be important to search for the vv-dependence of QQ in redshift samples of rich clusters.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.