Paper detail

Three-Pass Identification Scheme Based on MinRank Problem with Half Cheating Probability

In Asiacrypt 2001, Courtois proposed the first three-pass zero-knowledge identification (ID) scheme based on the MinRank problem. However, in a single round of Courtois' ID scheme, the cheating probability, i.e., the success probability of the cheating prover, is 2/3 which is larger than half. Although Courtois also proposed a variant scheme which is claimed to have half cheating probability, its security is not formally proven and it requires another hardness assumption on a specific one-way function and that verifier always generates challenges according to a specific non-uniform distribution. In this paper, we propose the first three-pass zero-knowledge ID scheme based on the MinRank problem with the cheating probability of exactly half for each round, even with only two-bit challenge space, without any additional assumption. Our proposed ID scheme requires fewer rounds and less total average communications costs compared to Curtois' under the same security level against impersonation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.