Paper detail

Three Modes of Metal-Enriched Star Formation in the Early Universe

Simulations of the formation of Population III (Pop III) stars suggest that they were much more massive than the Pop II and Pop I stars observed today. This is due to the collapse dynamics of metal-free gas, which is regulated by the radiative cooling of molecular hydrogen. We study how the collapse of gas clouds is altered by the addition of metals to the star-forming environment by performing a series of simulations of pre-enriched star formation at various metallicities. For metallicities below the critical metallicity, Z_cr, collapse proceeds similarly to the metal-free case, and only massive objects form. For metallicities well above Z_cr, efficient cooling rapidly lowers the gas temperature to the temperature of the CMB. The gas is unable to radiatively cool below the CMB temperature, and becomes thermally stable. For high metallicities, Z >= 10^-2.5 Zsun, this occurs early in the evolution of the gas cloud, when the density is still relatively low. The resulting cloud-cores show little or no fragmentation, and would most likely form massive stars. If the metallicity is not vastly above Z_cr, the cloud cools efficiently but does not reach the CMB temperature, and fragmentation into multiple objects occurs. We conclude that there were three distinct modes of star formation at high redshift (z >= 4): a `primordial' mode, producing massive stars (10s to 100s Msun) at very low metallicities (Z <= 10^-3.75 Zsun); a CMB-regulated mode, producing moderate mass (10s of Msun) stars at high metallicites (Z >= 10^-2.5 Zsun at redshift z ~ 15-20); and a low-mass (a few Msun) mode existing between those two metallicities. As the universe ages and the CMB temperature decreases, the range of the low mass mode extends to higher metallicities, eventually becoming the only mode of star formation. (Abridged)

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.