Paper detail

Three Mistakes in Pulsar Electrodynamics

In the paper Pulsar Electrodynamics, published in 1969, Goldreich and Julian propose some basic properties of pulsars, such as the oft-cited Goldreich-Julian density, light cylinder, open and closed magnetic field lines, corotation and so on. However, inspection of their mathematics reveals three mistakes: first, the relative velocity is irrelevantly replaced by the corotation velocity; second, a hypothesis in their theory is contradictory to Maxwell's equations; and third, their theory neglected a special solution of the frozen-in field equation which is of particular importance for pulsar research. We additionally describe the results of a series of magnetohydrodynamic experiments that may be beneficial to the understanding of pulsar electrodynamics.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.