Paper detail

Three-input Majority Function as the Unique Optimal Function for the Bias Amplification using Nonlocal Boxes

Brassard et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 250401 (2006)] showed that shared nonlocal boxes with the CHSH probability greater than $\frac{3+\sqrt{6}}6$ yields trivial communication complexity. There still exists the gap with the maximum CHSH probability $\frac{2+\sqrt{2}}4$ achievable by quantum mechanics. It is an interesting open question to determine the exact threshold for the trivial communication complexity. Brassard et al.'s idea is based on the recursive bias amplification by the 3-input majority function. It was not obvious if other choice of function exhibits stronger bias amplification. We show that the 3-input majority function is the unique optimal, so that one cannot improve the threshold $\frac{3+\sqrt{6}}6$ by Brassard et al.'s bias amplification. In this work, protocols for computing the function used for the bias amplification are restricted to be non-adaptive protocols or particular adaptive protocol inspired by Pawłowski et al.'s protocol for information causality [Nature 461, 1101 (2009)]. We first show a new adaptive protocol inspired by Pawłowski et al.'s protocol, and then show that the new adaptive protocol is better than any non-adaptive protocol. Finally, we show that the 3-input majority function is the unique optimal for the bias amplification if we apply the new adaptive protocol to each step of the bias amplification.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.