Paper detail

Three Experiments to Analyze the Nature of the Heat Spreader

In this paper, we describe ongoing work to investigate the properties of the heat spreader, and its implication on architecture research. In specific, we conduct two experiments to quantify the heat distribution across the surface of a spreader during normal operation. The first experiment uses T-type thermocouples, to find the temperature difference across different points on the spreader. We observe about a 6 degree celsius temperature difference on average. In the second experiment, we try to capture the temperature gradients using an infrared camera. However, this experiment was inconclusive because of some practical constraints such as the low emissivity of the spreader. We conclude that to properly model the spreader, it is necessary to conduct detailed finite element simulations. We describe a method to accurately measure the thermal conductivity of the heat spreader such that it can be used to compute the steady state temperature distribution across the spreader.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.