Paper detail

Three Dusty Star Forming Galaxies at $z\sim1.5$: Mergers and Disks on the Main Sequence

The main sequence of galaxies, a correlation between the star formation rates and stellar masses of galaxies, has been observed out to $z\sim4$. Galaxies within the scatter of the correlation are typically interpreted to be secularly evolving while galaxies with star formation rates elevated above the main sequence are interpreted to be undergoing interactions or to be Toomre-unstable disks with starbursting clumps. In this paper we investigate the recent merger histories of three dusty star forming galaxies, identified by their bright submillimeter emission at $z\sim1.5$. We analyze rest-frame optical and UV imaging, rest-frame optical emission line kinematics using slit spectra obtained with MOSFIRE on Keck I, and calculate Gini and M$_{20}$ statistics for each galaxy and conclude two are merger-driven while the third is an isolated disk galaxy. The disk galaxy lies $\sim$4$\times$ above the main sequence, one merger lies within the scatter of the main sequence, and one merger lies $\sim$4$\times$ below the main sequence. This hints that the location of a galaxy with respect to the main sequence may not be a useful discriminator of the recent star formation history of high-M$_{\star}$ galaxies at $z\sim1$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.