Paper detail

Three-dimensional weights of evidence modeling of a deep-seated porphyry Cu deposit

Given the challenges in data acquisition and modeling at the stage of detailed exploration, it is difficult to develop a prospectivity model, particularly for disseminated ore deposits. Recently, the weights of evidence (WofE) method has demonstrated a high efficiency for modeling such deposits. In this study, we propose a framework for creating a three-dimensional (3D) weights of evidence-based prospectivity model of the Nochoun porphyry Cu deposit in the Urmia-Dokhtar magmatic arc of Iran. The input data include qualitative geological and quantitative geochemical information obtained from boreholes and field observations. We combine ordinary and fuzzy weights of evidence for integrating qualitative and quantitative exploration criteria in a 3D space constrained by a metallogenic model of the study area for identifying a deep-seated ore body. Ordinary weights of evidence are determined for geological data, including lithology, alteration, rock type, and structure. Moreover, we determine the fuzzy weight of evidence for each class of continuous geochemical models created based on Fe, Mo, and Zn concentration values derived from boreholes. We integrate the input evidential models using WofE and create two prospectivity models (i.e., posterior and studentized posterior probability). We also determine anomalous voxels in the probability models using concentration-volume fractal models and validate them using prediction-volume plots. The modeling results indicate that the studentized posterior probability model is more efficient in identifying voxels representing copper mineralized rock volumes. We provide open source software for the proposed framework which can be used for exploring deep-seated ore bodies in other regions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.