Paper detail

Three-dimensional numerical investigations of the morphology of type Ia SNRs

We explore the morphology of Type Ia supernova remnants (SNRs) using three-dimensional hydrodynamics modeling and an exponential density profile. Our model distinguishes ejecta from the interstellar medium (ISM), and tracks the ionization age of shocked ejecta, both of which allow for additional analysis of the simulated remnants. We also include the adiabatic index as a free parameter, which affects the compressibility of the fluid and emulates the efficiency of cosmic ray acceleration by shock fronts. In addition to generating 3-D images of the simulations, we compute line-of-sight projections through the remnants for comparison against observations of Tycho's SNR and SN 1006. We find that several features observed in these two remnants, such as the separation between the fluid discontinuities and the presence of ejecta knots ahead of the forward shock, can be generated by smooth ejecta without any initial clumpiness. Our results are consistent with SN 1006 being dynamically younger than Tycho's SNR, and more efficiently accelerating cosmic rays at its forward shock. We conclude that clumpiness is not a necessary condition to reproduce many observed features of Type Ia supernova remnants, particularly the radial profiles and the fleecy emission from ejecta at the central region of both remnants.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.