Paper detail

Three-dimensional micro-structurally informed in silico myocardium -- towards virtual imaging trials in cardiac diffusion weighted MRI

In silico tissue models enable evaluating quantitative models of magnetic resonance imaging. This includes validating and sensitivity analysis of imaging biomarkers and tissue microstructure parameters. We propose a novel method to generate a realistic numerical phantom of myocardial microstructure. We extend previous studies accounting for the cardiomyocyte shape variability, water exchange between the cardiomyocytes (intercalated discs), myocardial microstructure disarray, and four sheetlet orientations. In the first stage of the method, cardiomyocytes and sheetlets are generated by considering the shape variability and intercalated discs in cardiomyocyte-to-cardiomyocyte connections. Sheetlets are then aggregated and oriented in the directions of interest. Our morphometric study demonstrates no significant difference ($p>0.01$) between the distribution of volume, length, and primary and secondary axes of the numerical and real (literature) cardiomyocyte data. Structural correlation analysis validates that the in-silico tissue is in the same class of disorderliness as the real tissue. Additionally, the absolute angle differences between the simulated helical angle (HA) and input HA (reference value) of the cardiomyocytes ($4.3^\circ\pm 3.1^\circ$) demonstrate a good agreement with the absolute angle difference between the measured HA using experimental cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) and histology (reference value) reported by (Holmes et al., 2000) ($3.7^\circ\pm6.4^\circ$) and (Scollan et al., 1998) ($4.9^\circ\pm 14.6^\circ$). The angular distance between eigenvectors and sheetlet angles of the input and simulated cDTI is smaller than those between measured angles using structural tensor imaging (gold standard) and experimental cDTI. These results confirm that the proposed method can generate richer numerical phantoms for the myocardium than previous studies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.