Paper detail

Three-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulations of massive and rotating progenitors

We present three-dimensional simulations of the core-collapse of massive rotating and non-rotating progenitors performed with the general relativistic neutrino hydrodynamics code CoCoNuT-FMT and analyse their explosion properties and gravitational-wave signals. The progenitor models include Wolf-Rayet stars with initial helium star masses of $39\,M_{\odot}$ and $20\,M_{\odot}$, and an $18\,M_{\odot}$ red supergiant. The $39\,M_{\odot}$ model is a rapid rotator, whereas the two other progenitors are non-rotating. Both Wolf-Rayet models produce healthy neutrino-driven explosions, whereas the red supergiant model fails to explode. By the end of the simulations, the explosion energies have already reached $1.1\times 10^{51}\,\mathrm{erg}$ and $0.6\times 10^{51}\,\mathrm{erg}$ for the $39\,M_{\odot}$ and $20\,M_{\odot}$ model, respectively. The explosions produce neutron stars of relatively high mass, but with modest kicks. Due to the alignment of the bipolar explosion geometry with the rotation axis, there is a relatively small misalignment of $30^\circ$ between the spin and the kick in the $39\,M_{\odot}$ model. In terms of gravitational-wave signals, the massive and rapidly rotating $39\,M_{\odot}$ progenitor stands out by large gravitational-wave amplitudes that would make it detectable out to almost 2 Mpc by the Einstein Telescope. For this model, we find that rotation significantly changes the dependence of the characteristic gravitational-wave frequency of the f-mode on the proto-neutron star parameters compared to the non-rotating case. The other two progenitors have considerably smaller detection distances, despite significant low-frequency emission in the most sensitive frequency band of current gravitational-wave detectors due to the standing accretion shock instability in the $18\,M_{\odot}$ model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.