Paper detail

ThreatLinker: An NLP-based Methodology to Automatically Estimate CVE Relevance for CAPEC Attack Patterns

Threat analysis is continuously growing in importance due to the always-increasing complexity and frequency of cyber attacks. Analyzing threats demands significant effort from security experts: different cybersecurity knowledge bases support this task, but manual efforts are required to correlate heterogeneous sources into a unified view that would enable a more comprehensive assessment. To address this gap, we propose ThreatLinker, a methodology leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP) to effectively and efficiently associate Common Vulnerabilities and Exposure (CVE) vulnerabilities with Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) attack patterns. The proposed technique combines semantic similarity with keyword analysis to improve the accuracy of association estimations. We contributed a larger dataset for CVE-CAPEC correlation, and experimental evaluations demonstrate superior performance compared to state-of-the-art models.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.