Paper detail

Thomson Scattering and Collisional Ionization in the X-rays Grating Spectra of the Recurrent Nova U Scorpii

We present a Chandra observation of the recurrent nova U Scorpii, done with the HRC-S detector and the LETG grating on day 18 after the observed visual maximum of 2010, and compare it with XMM-Newton observations obtained in days 23 and 35 after maximum. The total absorbed flux was in the range 2.2-2.6 x 10^(-11) erg cm^(-2) s^(-1), corresponding to unabsorbed luminosity 7-8.5 x 10^(36)x(d/12 kpc)^2 for N(H)=2-2.7x10^(21) cm^(-2). On day 18, 70% of the soft X-tray flux was in a continuum typical of a very hot white dwarf (WD) atmosphere, which accounted for about 80% of the flux on days 23 and 35. In addition all spectra display very broad emission lines, due to higher ionization stages at later times. With Chandra we observed apparent P Cygni profiles. We find that these peculiar profiles are not due to blue shifted absorption and red shifted emission in photoionized ejecta, like the optical P Cyg of novae, but they are rather a superposition of WD atmospheric absorption features reflected by the already discovered Thomson scattering corona, and emission lines due to collisional ionization in condensations in the ejecta. On days 23 and 35 the absorption components were no longer measurable, having lost the initial large blue shift that displaced them from the core of the broad emission lines. We interpret this as indication that mass loss ceased between day 18 and day 23. On day 35, the emission lines spectrum became very complex, with several different components. Model atmospheres indicate that the WD atmospheric temperature was about 730,000 K on day 18 and reached 900,000 K--one million K on day 35. This peak temperature is consistent with a WD mass of at least 1.3 M(sol).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.