Paper detail

Thomas-Fermi scaling in the energy spectra of atomic ions

The energy spectra of atomic ions are re-examined from the point of view of Thomas-Fermi scaling relations. For the first ionization potential, which sets the energy scale for the true discrete spectrum, Thomas-Fermi theory predicts the following relation: E_{ioniz}=Z^2 N^{-2/3} g(N/Z), where Z is the nuclear charge, N is the number of electrons, and g is a function of N/Z. This relation does not hold for neutral atoms, but works extremely well in the cationic domain, Z>N. We provide an analytic expression for g, with two adjustable parameters, which fits the available experimental data for more than 380 ions. In addition, we show that a rough fit to the integrated density of states with a single exponential: N_{states}=exp (Delta E/Theta), where Delta E is the excitation energy, leads to a parameter, Theta, exhibiting a universal scaling a la Thomas-Fermi: Theta=Z^2 N^{-4/3} h(N/Z), where h is approximately linear near N/Z=1.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.