Paper detail

Thin-gap averaging of variable-viscosity flows: application to thermoviscous fingering

A consistent averaging technique, using the weighted residual integral boundary layer (WRIBL) method, is presented for flow through a thin-gap geometry wherein the fluid's viscosity varies across the gap. In such situations, the flow has a non-parabolic cross-gap velocity profile -- an effect that is ignored by Darcy models conventionally used for such Hele-Shaw flows. The WRIBL technique systematically accounts for the cross-gap variation of viscosity and yields reduced-order equations for the gap-averaged fluid flow rate. As a test case, we consider a fluid with a temperature-dependent viscosity and analyse the previously-studied problem of thermoviscous fingering: a hot fluid flowing through a Hele-Shaw geometry with cold walls spontaneously forms channels of low-viscosity, hot fluid, separated by regions of high-viscosity, cold fluid. The temperature of the cold walls is assumed either to be constant, a scenario that mimics the upward flow of magma through fissures in the Earth's crust, or to vary linearly along the direction of flow. In both cases, the predictions of the WRIBL model, regarding the multiplicity of uniform steady flow states and their linear stability, are compared with that of the hitherto used, ad hoc, Darcy model (Helfrich, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 305, 1995, pp. 219-238), as well as with calculations of the full three-dimensional governing equations (Wylie and Lister, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 305, 1995, pp. 239-261). Though the results are qualitatively similar, the WRIBL model is found to be much more accurate than the Darcy model. The averaging method is presented in a general manner to facilitate its application to other physical situations where, for example, the viscosity depends on solute/particle concentration in a solution/suspension.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.