Paper detail

Thickness and Outerthickness for Embedded Graphs

We consider the thickness $θ(G))$ and outerthickness $θ_o(G)$ of a graph G in terms of its orientable and nonorientable genus. Dean and Hutchinson provided upper bounds for thickness of graphs in terms of their orientable genus. More recently, Concalves proved that the outerthickness of any planar graph is at most 2. In this paper, we apply the method of deleting spanning disks of embeddings to approximate the thickness and outerthickness of graphs. We first obtain better upper bounds for thickness. We then use a similar approach to provide upper bounds for outerthickness of graphs in terms of their orientable and nonorientable genera. Finally we show that the outerthickness of the torus (the maximum outerthickness of all toroidal graphs) is 3. We also show that all graphs embeddable in the double torus have thickness at most 3 and outerthickness at most 5.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.