Paper detail

Thermomechanical Assessment of Breast Tumor Subjected to Focused Ultrasound and Interstitial Laser Heating

During laser and ultrasound thermotherapy it is always desirable to have a precise necrosis of deeply seated tumor preserving the adjoining healthy tissue with minimum thermally induced nociceptive pain sensation to the patient. The aim of the present study is to determine the effects of nanoparticle mixed tissues under pulsed and continuous heating during high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). The present problem incorporating the tissue thermal relaxation times ( ) was solved in a 3-dimensional multilayered vasculature breast tumor model signifying the complex inhomogeneous tissue structure. The coupled Radiative transfer, Helmontz, momentum, dual phase lag (DPL) and equilibrium equations for optic, acoustic, fluid, temperature and mechanical fields respectively were solved simultaneously using COMSOL Multiphysics (Bangalore, India) software. An in-vitro study on agar based tissue phantom was also performed to validate the present numerical results of focused ultrasound heating. The thermal relaxation times of tissue causes significant changes of thermal and damage history under focused ultrasound heating compared to unfocused laser heating. With limited rise in tissue temperature, the pulsed mode of heating for longer period with lower duty cycle (16.6%) shows a target specific necrotic damage with reduced nociceptive pain in contrast to continuous mode of heating. Further, the presence of nanoparticles and multilevel artery and vein affect both the thermal and mechanical response under external heating. Thus, the present findings could help to understand the role of different external heating modes and sources on tumor necrosis during clinical practice of thermo-therapy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.