Paper detail

Thermodynamics of Shearing Massless Scalar Field Spacetimes is Inconsistent With the Weyl Curvature Hypothesis

Our Universe has an arrow of time. In accordance with the second law of thermodynamics, entropy has been increasing ever since the Big Bang. The fact that matter is in thermal equilibrium in the very early Universe, as indicated by the cosmic microwave background, has led to the idea that gravitational entropy must be very low in the beginning. Penrose proposed that gravitational entropy can be quantified by the Weyl curvature, which increases as structures formed. A concrete realization of such a measure is the Clifton-Ellis-Tavakol gravitational entropy, which has been shown to be increasing in quite a number of cosmological models. In this work, we show a counter-example involving a class of inhomogeneous universes that are supported by a chameleon massless scalar field and exhibit anisotropic spacetime shearing effects. In fact, in our model the Clifton-Ellis-Tavakol gravitational entropy is increasing although the magnitude of the Weyl curvature is decreasing; this is due to the growth of the spacetime shear. The topology and the values of the three free parameters of the model are constrained by imposing a positive energy density for the cosmic fluid, and the thermodynamical requirements which follow from the cosmological holographic principle and the second law. It is shown that a negative deceleration parameter and a time decreasing Weyl curvature automatically follow from those conditions. Thus, we argue that our model can account for the formation of some primordial structures, like the Large Quasar Groups, which has required a non-standard evolution of the spatial anisotropies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.