Paper detail

Thermodynamics and Evaporation of the 2+1-D Black Hole

The properties of canonical and microcanonical ensembles of a black hole with thermal radiation and the problem of black hole evaporation in 3-D are studied. In 3-D Einstein-anti-de Sitter gravity we have two relevant mass scales, $m_c=1/G$, and $m_p=(\hbar^2Λ/G)^{1/3}$, which are particularly relevant for the evaporation problem. It is argued that in the `weak coupling' regime $Λ<(\hbar G)^{-2}$, the end point of an evaporating black hole formed with an initial mass $m_0>m_p$, is likely to be a stable remnant in equilibrium with thermal radiation. The relevance of these results for the information problem and for the issue of back reaction is discussed. In the `strong coupling' regime, $Λ>(\hbar G)^{-2}$ a full fledged quantum gravity treatment is required. Since the total energy of thermal states in anti-de Sitter space with reflective boundary conditions at spatial infinity is bounded and conserved, the canonical and microcanonical ensembles are well defined. For a given temperature or energy black hole states are locally stable. In the weak coupling regime black hole states are more probable then pure radiation states.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.