Paper detail

Thermodynamic model of solute site preferences in ordered alloys

A thermodynamic model based on the law of mass action is used to calculate concentrations of elementary point defects and to determine site preferences of solute atoms in ordered alloys. Combinations of lattice vacancies, antisite atoms and host interstitials that form equilibrium defects are enumerated for the CsCl (B2) and Ni2Al3 structures. For CsCl, in addition to the two substitutional sites, a distorted tetrahedral interstitial site is considered. For Ni2Al3, the Ni site, two distinct Al sites and a vacant, insterstitial-type Ni-site are considered. An equation of constraint among concentrations of elementary defects is derived that is valid for any crystal structure. The concentration of a selected defect can be solved using the equation of constraint in conjunction with mass-action equations for defect combinations. The method leads directly to defect concentrations without the need to evaluate composition-dependent chemical potentials, resulting in a more transparent formalism. The model is used to explore the phenomenology of site-preferences of dilute ternary solute atoms. Findings are in agreement with previous treatments restricted to substitutional sites. General rules for how site-preferences depend on temperature and on composition in non-stoichiometric compounds are obtained through algebraic analysis and numerical simulations: (1) Solute S tends to occupy substitutional sites of the element in which there is a deficiency. (2) If the difference of energies of S on sites A and B is very positive or negative, then S will occupy site B or A exclusively, independent of composition. If the difference of site energies is intermediate, the solute will switch from one site to the other as the composition changes. (3) Solutes have a tendency to occupy interstitial or empty-lattice sites with a maximum site-fraction near the stoichiometric composition.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.