Paper detail

Thermodynamic Limit for the Mallows Model on $S_n$

The Mallows model on $S_n$ is a probability distribution on permutations, $q^{d(π,e)}/P_n(q)$, where $d(π,e)$ is the distance between $π$ and the identity element, relative to the Coxeter generators. Equivalently, it is the number of inversions: pairs $(i,j)$ where $1\leq i<j\leq n$, but $π_i>π_j$. Analyzing the normalization $P_n(q)$, Diaconis and Ram calculated the mean and variance of $d(π,e)$ in the Mallows model, which suggests the appropriate $n \to \infty$ limit has $q_n$ scaling as $1-β/n$. We calculate the distribution of the empirical measure in this limit, $u(x,y) dx dy = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} δ_{(i,π_i)}$. Treating it as a mean-field problem, analogous to the Curie-Weiss model, the self-consistent mean-field equations are $\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y} \ln u(x,y) = 2 βu(x,y)$, which is an integrable PDE, known as the hyperbolic Liouville equation. The explicit solution also gives a new proof of formulas for the blocking measures in the weakly asymmetric exclusion process, and the ground state of the $\mathcal{U}_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$-symmetric XXZ ferromagnet.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.