Paper detail

Thermodynamic inconsistency in quasiparticle model - a revisit

Widely studied quasiparticle models for quark gluon plasma is revisited here to understand the statistical mechanics and thermodynamics of the system. We investigate the statistical mechanics and thermodynamics inconsistencies involved in these models and their consequences in the observables. Quasiparticle model is a phenomenological model with few parameters and by adjusting them all models fit the results of lattice gauge simulation of gluon plasma \cite{bo.1}. However, after fixing 2 of the 3 parameters of the model by physical arguments, only one quasiparticle model, which is consistent with both statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, fits the Bielefeld lattice data \cite{bo.1}. The same model also fits the recent lattice results of Wuppertal-Budapest group \cite{fo.1}, which deals with precision SU(3) thermodynamics for a large temperature range, reasonably well.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.