Paper detail

Thermodynamic considerations on a class of dislocation-based constitutive models

Dislocations are the main carriers of plastic deformation in crystalline materials. Physically based constitutive equations of crystal plasticity typically incorporate dislocation mechanisms, using a dislocation density based description of dislocation microstructure evolution and plastic flow. Typically, such constitutive models are not formulated in a thermodynamic framework. Nevertheless, fundamental considerations of thermodynamic consistency impose constraints on the admissible range of model parameters and/or on the range of application of such models. In particular, it is mandatory to ensure that the internal energy increase associated with dislocation accumulation is properly accounted for in the local energy balance. We demonstrate on some examples taken from the literature how failure to do so can lead to constitutive equations that violate the first and second laws of thermodynamics either generally or in some particular limit cases, and we discuss how to formulate constraints that recover thermodynamic consistency.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.