Paper detail

Thermodynamic and corrosion study of Sm$_{1-x}$Mg$_x$Ni$_y$ (y = 3.5 or 3.8) compounds forming reversible hydrides

AB5 compounds (A = rare earth, B = transition metal) have been widely studied as anodes for Ni-MH applications. However, they have reached their technical limitations and the search for new promising materials with high capacity is foreseen. ABy compounds (2 < y < 5) are good candidates. They are made by stacking [AB5] and [A2B4] units along the c crystallographic axis. The latter unit allows a large increase in capacity, while the [AB5] unit provides good cycling stability. Consequently, the AB3.8 composition (i.e. A5B19 with three [AB5] for one [A2B4]) is expected to exhibit better cycling stability than the AB3.5 (i.e. A2B7 with two [AB5] for one [A2B4]). Furthermore, substitution of rare earth by light magnesium improves both the capacity and cycling stability. In this paper, we compare the hydrogenation and corrosion properties of two binary compounds SmNi$_{3.5}$ and SmNi$_{3.8}$ and two pseudo-binary ones (Sm,Mg)Ni$_{3.5}$ and (Sm,Mg)Ni$_{3.8}$. A better solid-gas cycling stability is highlighted for the binary SmNi$_{3.8}$. The pseudo-binary compounds also exhibit higher cycling stability than the binary ones. Furthermore, their resistance to corrosion was investigated.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.