Paper detail

Thermodynamic analysis of quantum error correcting engines

Quantum error correcting codes can be cast in a way which is strikingly similar to a quantum heat engine undergoing an Otto cycle. In this paper we strengthen this connection further by carrying out a complete assessment of the thermodynamic properties of 4-strokes operator-based error correcting codes. This includes an expression for the entropy production in the cycle which, as we show, contains clear contributions stemming from the different sources of irreversibility. To illustrate our results, we study a classical 3-qubit error correcting code, well suited for incoherent states, and the 9-qubit Shor code capable of handling fully quantum states. We show that the work cost associated with the correction gate is directly associated with the heat introduced by the error. Moreover, the work cost associated with encoding/decoding quantum information is always positive, a fact which is related to the intrinsic irreversibility introduced by the noise. Finally, we find that correcting the coherent (and thus genuinely quantum) part of a quantum state introduces substantial modifications related to the Hadamard gates required to encode and decode coherences.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.