Paper detail

Thermally Driven Winds from Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows

Radiatively inefficient accretion flows (RIAFs) are common feature of low-luminosity accretion flows, including quiescent states of X-ray binaries and low-lunimosity active galactic nuclei. Thermally driven winds are expected from such hot accretion flows. By assuming that the flow has self-similarity structure in the radial direction, we solve the vertical structure of the wind and accretion flows simultaneously and evaluate the mass loss rates by wind. We find that the ratio of the outflow rate to the accretion rate is approximately unity for a viscosity parameter, alpha lesssim 0.1, despite some uncertainties in the angular momentum and temperature distributions. That is, the accretion rate in the RIAFs is roughly proportional to the radius. Moreover, we elucidate the effect of cooling by wind on the underneath accretion flow, finding that this effect could be important for calculating energy spectrum of the RIAF. Observational implications are briefly discussed in the context of Sgr A*.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.