Paper detail

Thermalization in Relativistic Outflows and the Correlation between Spectral Hardness and Apparent Luminosity in Gamma-ray Bursts

We present an interpretation of the phenomenological relations between the spectral peak, isotropic luminosity and duration of long gamma ray bursts that have been discovered by Amati et al., Ghirlanda et al., Firmani et al., and Liang & Zhang. In our proposed model, a jet undergoes internal dissipation which prevents its bulk Lorentz factor from exceeding 1/theta (theta being the jet opening angle) until it escapes from the core of its progenitor star, at a radius of order 1e10 cm; dissipation may continue at larger radii. The dissipated radiation will be partially thermalized, and we identify its thermal peak (Doppler boosted by the outflow) with E_pk. The radiation comes, in effect, from within the jet photosphere. The non-thermal, high energy part of the GRB emission arises from Comptonization of this radiation by relativistic electrons and positrons outside the effective photosphere. This model can account naturally not only for the surprisingly small scatter in the various claimed correlations, but also for the normalization, as well as the slopes. It then has further implications for the jet energy, the limiting jet Lorentz factor, and the relation of the energy, opening angle and burst duration to the mass and radius of the stellar stellar progenitor. The observed relation between pulse width and photon frequency can be reproduced by inverse-Compton emission at ~ 1e14 cm from the engine, but there are significant constraints on the energy distribution and isotropy of the radiating particles.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.