Paper detail

Thermal Stability of White Dwarfs Accreting Hydrogen-rich Matter and Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae

We revisit the properties of white dwarfs accreting hydrogen-rich matter by constructing steady-state models, in which hydrogen shell burning consumes hydrogen at the same rate as the white dwarf accretes it. We obtain such steady-state models for various accretion rates and white dwarf masses. We confirm that these steady models are thermally stable only when the accretion rate is higher than \sim 10^{-7} M_sun/yr. We show that recent models of ``quiescent burning'' in the ``surface hydrogen burning'' at a much wider range of accretion rates results from the too large zone mass in the outer part of the models; hydrogen burning must occur in a much thinner layer. A comparison of the positions on the HR diagram suggests that most of the luminous supersoft X-ray sources are white dwarfs accreting matter at rates high enough that the hydrogen burning shell is thermally stable. Implications on the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae are discussed.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.