Paper detail

Thermal radiative cooling of carbon cluster cations C$_N^+$, $N = 9, 11,12, 17-27$

The radiative cooling rates of C$_N^+$ clusters ($N = 9, 11, 12, 17-27$) have been measured in the ultrahigh vacuum of an electrostatic storage ring to values on the order of $10^4$ s$^{-1}$. The rates were measured as a competing channel to unimolecular decay, and the rate constants pertain to the excitation energies where these two channels compete. Such high values can only be explained as photon emission from thermally excited electronic states, a mechanism that has also been seen in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon cations. The high rates have a very strong stabilizing effect on the clusters and the underlying mechanism gives a high energy conversion efficiency, with the potential to reach high quantum efficiencies in the emission process. The competing decay of unimolecular fragmentation defines upper limits for photon energies that can be down-converted to lower energy photons. Including previously measured cluster sizes provides the limits for all clusters C$_N^+$, $N=8-27$, of values that vary from 10 to 14.5 eV, with a general increase with size. Clusters absorbing photons of energies below these limits cool down efficiently by emission of photons via electronic transitions and their fragmentation is strongly reduced, increasing their survival in HI regions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.