Paper detail

Thermal Operations in general are not memoryless

So-called Thermal Operations seem to describe the most fundamental, and reasonable, set of operations allowable for state transformations at an ambient inverse temperature $β$. However, a priori, they require experimentalists to manipulate very complex environments and have control over their internal degrees of freedom. For this reason, the community has been working on creating more experimentally-friendly operations. In [Perry et al., Phys. Rev. X 8, 041049] it was shown that for states diagonal in the energy basis, that Thermal Operations can be performed by so-called Coarse Operations, which need just one auxiliary qubit, but are otherwise Markovian and classical in spirit. In this work, by providing an explicit counterexample, we show that this one qubit of memory is necessary. We also fully characterize the possible transitions that do not require memory for the system being a qubit. We do this by analyzing arbitrary control sequences comprising level energy changes and partial thermalizations in each step.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.