Paper detail

Thermal Instability & the Feedback Regulation of Hot Halos in Clusters, Groups, and Galaxies

Observations of clusters and groups imply that such halos are roughly in global thermal equilibrium, with heating balancing cooling when averaged over sufficiently long time- and length-scales; the ICM is, however, very likely to be locally thermally unstable. Using simple observationally-motivated heating prescriptions, we show that local thermal instability (TI) can produce a multi-phase medium---with ~ 10000 K cold filaments condensing out of the hot ICM---only when the ratio of the TI timescale in the hot plasma (t_{TI}) to the free-fall timescale (t_{ff}) satisfies t_{TI}/t_{ff} <~ 10. This criterion quantitatively explains why cold gas and star formation are preferentially observed in low-entropy clusters and groups. In addition, the interplay among heating, cooling, and TI reduces the net cooling rate and the mass accretion rate at small radii by factors of ~ 100 relative to cooling-flow models. This dramatic reduction is in line with observations. The feedback efficiency required to prevent a cooling-flow is ~ 0.001 for clusters and decreases for lower mass halos; supernova heating may be energetically sufficient to balance cooling in galactic halos. We further argue that the ICM self-adjusts so that t_{TI}/t_{ff} >~ 10 at all radii. When this criterion is not satisfied, cold filaments condense out of the hot phase and reduce the density of the ICM. These cold filaments can power the black hole and/or stellar feedback required for global thermal balance, which drives t_{TI}/t_{ff} >~ 10. In comparison to clusters, groups have central cores with lower densities and larger radii. This can account for the deviations from self-similarity in the X-ray luminosity-temperature (L_X-T_X) relation. The high-velocity clouds observed in the Galactic halo can also be due to local TI producing multi-phase gas close to the virial radius.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.