Paper detail

Thermal instability in the collisionally cooled gas

We have presented the non-equilibrium (time-dependent) cooling rate and ionization state calculations for a gas behind shock waves with $v \sim 50-150$ km s$^{-1}$ ($T_s \sim 0.5 - 6\times 10^5$ K). Such shock waves do not lead to the radiative precursor formation, i.e. the thermal evolution of a gas behind the shock waves are controlled by collisions only. We have found that the cooling rate in a gas behind the shock waves with $v \sim 50-120$ km s$^{-1}$ ($T_s \sim 0.5 - 3\times 10^5$ K) differs considerably from the cooling rate for a gas cooled from $T = 10^8$ K. It is well-known that a gas cooled from $T = 10^8$ K is thermally unstable for isobaric and isochoric perturbations at $T \simgt 2\times 10^4$ K. We have studied the thermal instability in a collisionally controlled gas for shock waves with $v \sim 50-150$ km s$^{-1}$. We have found that the temperature range, where the postshock gas is thermally unstable, is significantly modified and depends on both gas metallicity and ionic composition of a gas before shock wave. For $Z \simgt 0.1Z_\odot$ the temperature range, where the thermal instability criterion for isochoric perturbations is not fulfilled, widens in comparison with that for a gas cooled from $T = 10^8$ K, while that for isobaric perturbations remains almost without a change. For $Z\sim Z_\odot$ a gas behind shock waves with $v \simlt 65$ km s$^{-1}$ ($T_s \simlt 10^5$ K) is thermally stable to isochoric perturbations during full its evolution. We have shown that the transition from isobaric to isochoric cooling for a gas with $Z \simgt 0.1Z_\odot$ behind shock waves with $T_s = 0.5 - 3\times 10^5$ K proceeds at lower column density layer behind a shock wave than that for a gas cooled from $T = 10^8$ K. (abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.