Paper detail

Thermal Instability in Gravitationally-Stratified Plasmas: Implications for Multi-Phase Structure in Clusters and Galaxy Halos

We study the interplay among cooling, heating, conduction, and magnetic fields in gravitationally stratified plasmas using simplified, plane-parallel numerical simulations. Since the physical heating mechanism remains uncertain in massive halos such as groups or clusters, we adopt a simple, observationally-motivated prescription which enforces global thermal equilibrium when averaged over large scales. The plasma remains susceptible to local thermal instability, however, and cooling drives an inward flow of material. In contrast to previous results, we argue that the thermal stability of the plasma is independent of its convective stability. We find that the ratio of the cooling timescale to the dynamical timescale t_cool/t_ff controls the saturation of the thermal instability: when t_cool/t_ff < 1, the plasma develops extended multi-phase structure, whereas when t_cool / t_ff > 1 it does not. (In a companion paper, we show that the criterion for thermal instability in a spherical potential is somewhat less stringent, t_cool / t_ff < 10.) When thermal conduction is anisotropic with respect to the magnetic field, the criterion for multi-phase structure is essentially independent of the thermal conductivity of the plasma. Our criterion for local thermal instability to produce multi-phase structure is an extension of the cold vs. hot accretion modes in galaxy formation that applies at all radii in hot halos, not just to the virial shock. We show that this criterion is consistent with data on multi-phase gas in the ACCEPT sample of clusters; in addition, when t_cool / t_ff > 1, the net cooling rate to low temperatures and the mass flux to small radii are suppressed enough relative to models without heating to be qualitatively consistent with star formation rates and x-ray line emission in groups and clusters.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.