Paper detail

Thermal evolution of the early Moon

The early thermal evolution of Moon has been numerically simulated to understand the magnitude of the impact induced heating and the initially stored thermal energy of the accreting Moonlets. The main objective of the present study is to understand the nature of processes leading to core-mantle differentiation and the production and cooling of the initial convective magma ocean. The accretion of Moon was commenced over a timescale of 100 years after the giant impact event around 30-100 million years in the early solar system. We studied the dependence of the planetary processes on the impact scenarios, the initial average temperature of the accreting moonlets and the size of the protoMoon that accreted rapidly beyond the Roche limit within the initial one year after the giant impact. The simulations indicate that the accreting Moonlets should have a minimum initial averaged temperature around 1600 K. The impacts would provide additional thermal energy. The initial thermal state of the moonlets depends upon the environment prevailing within the Roche limit that experienced episodes of extensive vaporization and re-condensation of silicates. The initial convective magma ocean of depth more than 1000 km is produced in the majority of simulations along with the global core-mantle differentiation in case the melt percolation of the molten metal through porous flow from bulk silicates was not the major mode of core-mantle differentiation. The possibility of shallow magma oceans cannot be ruled out in the presence of the porous flow. Our simulations indicate the core-mantle differentiation within the initial $10^2$-$10^3$ years of the Moon accretion. The majority of the convective magma ocean cooled down for crystallization within the initial $10^3$-$10^4$ years.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.