Paper detail

Thermal Emission in the Southwest Clump of VY CMa

We present high spatial resolution LBTI/NOMIC $9-12$ $μm$ images of VY CMa and its massive outflow feature, the Southwest (SW) Clump. Combined with high-resolution imaging from HST ($0.4-1$ $μm$) and LBT/LMIRCam ($1-5$ $μm$), we isolate the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the clump from the star itself. Using radiative-transfer code DUSTY, we model both the scattered light from VY CMa and the thermal emission from the dust in the clump to estimate the optical depth, mass, and temperature of the SW Clump. The SW Clump is optically thick at 8.9 $μm$ with a brightness temperature of $\sim$200 K. With a dust chemistry of equal parts silicates and metallic iron, as well as assumptions on grain size distribution, we estimate a dust mass of $5.4\times10^{-5}\,M_\odot$. For a gas--to--dust ratio of 100, this implies a total mass of $5.4\times10^{-3}\,M_\odot$. Compared to the typical mass-loss rate of VY CMa, the SW Clump represents an extreme, localized mass-loss event from $\lesssim300$ years ago.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.