Paper detail

Thermal emission from bow shocks II: 3D magnetohydrodynamic models of Zeta Ophiuchi

The nearby, massive, runaway star Zeta Ophiuchi has a large bow shock detected in optical and infrared, and, uniquely among runaway O stars, diffuse X-ray emission is detected from the shocked stellar wind. Here we make the first detailed computational investigation of the bow shock of Zeta Ophiuchi, to test whether a simple model of the bow shock can explain the observed nebula, and to compare the detected X-ray emission with simulated emission maps. We re-analysed archival {\it Chandra} observations of the thermal diffuse X-ray emission from the shocked wind region of the bow shock, finding total unabsorbed X-ray flux (0.3-2 keV band) corresponding to a diffuse luminosity of $L_\mathrm{X}=2.33~(0.79-3.45)\times10^{29}$ergs$^{-1}$. 3D MHD simulations were used to model the interaction of the star's wind with a uniform ISM using a range of stellar and ISM parameters motivated by observational constraints. Synthetic infrared, Ha, soft X-ray, emission measure, and radio 6\,GHz emission maps were generated from three simulations, for comparison with relevant observations. Simulations where the space velocity of Zeta Ophiuchi has a significant radial velocity produce infrared emission maps with opening angle of the bow shock in better agreement with observations than for the case where motion is fully in the plane of the sky. The simulation with the highest pressure has the closest match, with flux level within a factor of 2 of the observational lower limit, and emission weighted temperature of $\log_{10}(T_\mathrm{A}/\mathrm{K})=6.4$, although the morphology of the diffuse emission appears somewhat different. Observed X-ray emission is a filled bubble brightest near the star whereas simulations predict brightening towards the contact discontinuity as density increases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.