Paper detail

Thermal conductivity of graphene isotope superlattices

Graphene has a high intrinsic thermal conductivity and a high electron mobility. The thermal conductivity of graphene can be significantly reduced when different carbon isotopes are mixed, which can enhance the performance of thermoelectric devices. Here we compare the thermal conductivities of isotopic c12/c13 random mixes with isotope superlattices with periods ranging from 46 to 225 nm. Raman Opto-Thermal conductivity measurements of these superlattice structures show an approximately 50% reduction in thermal conductivity compared to pristine c12 graphene. This average reduction is similar to the random isotope mix. The reduction of the thermal conductivity in the superlattice is well described by a model of pristine graphene and an additional quasi-one dimensional periodic interfacial thermal resistance of (2.5\pm 0.5)\times 10^{-11} m^2 K/W for the c12/c13 boundary. This is consistent with a large anisotropic thermal conductivity in the superlattice, where the thermal conductivity depends on the orientation of the c12/c13 boundary.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.