Paper detail

Thermal Components in Gamma-ray Bursts. II. Constraining the Hybrid Jet Model

In explaining the physical origin of the jet composition of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), a more general picture, i.e. the hybrid jet model (which introduced another magnetization parameter $σ_{0}$ on the basis of the traditional fireball model), has been well studied in Gao \& Zhang. However, it still has not yet been applied to a large GRB sample. Here, we first employ the "top-down" approach of Gao \& Zhang to diagnose the photosphere properties at the central engine to see how the hybrid model can account for the observed data as well, through applying a {\it Fermi} GRB sample (eight bursts) with the detected photosphere component, as presented in Li (our Paper I). We infer all physical parameters of a hybrid problem with three typical values of the radius of the jet base ($r_{0}$ = 10$^{7}$, 10$^{8}$, and 10$^{9}$ cm). We find that the dimensionless entropy for all the bursts shows $η\gg$ 1 while the derived (1+$σ_{0}$) for five bursts (GRB 081224, GRB 110721A, GRB 090719, GRB 100707, and GRB 100724) is larger than unity, indicating that in addition to a hot fireball component, another cold Poynting-flux component may also play an important role. Our analysis also shows that in a few time bins for all $r_{0}$ in GRB 081224 and GRB 110721A, the magnetization parameter at $\sim$ 10$^{15}$cm (1+$σ_{\rm r15}$) is greater than unity, which implies that internal-collision-induced magnetic reconnection and turbulence may be the mechanism to power the nonthermal emission, rather than internal shocks. We conclude that the majority of bursts (probably all) can be well explained by the hybrid jet problem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.