Paper detail

Thermal characteristics and the differential emission measure distribution during a B8.3 flare on July 04, 2009

We investigate the evolution of differential emission measure distribution (DEM[T]) in various phases of a B8.3 flare, which occurred on July 04, 2009. We analyze the soft X-ray (SXR) emission in 1.6-8.0 keV range, recorded collectively by Solar Photometer in X-rays (SphinX; Polish) and Solar X-ray Spectrometer (SOXS; Indian) instruments. We make a comparative investigation of the best-fit DEM[T] distributions derived by employing various inversion schemes viz. single gaussian, power-law, functions and Withbroe-Sylwester (W-S) maximum likelihood algorithm. In addition, SXR spectrum in three different energy bands viz. 1.6-5.0 keV (low), 5.0-8.0 keV (high) and 1.6-8.0 keV (combined) is analyzed to determine the dependence of the best-fit DEM[T] distribution on the selection of energy interval. The evolution of DEM[T] distribution, derived using W-S algorithm, reveals the plasma of multi-thermal nature during the rise to the maximum phase of the flare, while of isothermal nature in the post-maximum phase of the flare. Thermal energy content is estimated considering the flare plasma to be of 1) iso-thermal and 2) multi-thermal nature. We find that the energy content during the flare, estimated from the multi-thermal approach, is in good agreement with that derived using the iso-thermal assumption except during the maximum of the flare. Further, (multi-) thermal energy estimated employing low-energy band of the SXR spectrum result in higher values than that derived from the combined-energy band. On the contrary, the analysis of high-energy band of SXR spectrum lead to lower thermal energy than that estimated from the combined-energy band.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.