Paper detail

Thermal boundary conductance of CVD-grown MoS$_2$ monolayer-on-silica substrate determined by scanning thermal microscopy

We characterize heat dissipation of supported molybdenum disulfide (MoS$_2$) monolayers grown by chemical vapor deposition by means of ambient-condition scanning thermal microscopy (SThM). We find that the thermal boundary conductance of the MoS$_2$ monolayers in contact with 300 nm of SiO$_2$ is around 4.6 $\pm$ 2 MW m$^{-2}$ K$^{-1}$. This value is in the low range of the values determined for exfoliated flakes with other techniques such as Raman thermometry, which span an order of magnitude (0.44-50 MW m$^{-2}$ K$^{-1}$), and underlines the dispersion of measurements. The sensitivity to the in-plane thermal conductivity of supported MoS$_2$ is very low, highlighting that the thermal boundary conductance is the key driver of heat dissipation for the MoS$_2$ monolayer when it is not suspended. In addition, this work also demonstrates that SThM calibration using different thicknesses of SiO$_2$, initially aimed at being used with bulk materials can be extended to 2D materials.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.