Paper detail

Thermal and Non-thermal X-Rays from the Galactic Supernova Remnant G348.5+0.1

We report on Suzaku results of the two distinct regions in the Galactic supernova remnant G348.5+0.1: extended thermal X-rays ("soft diffuse") at the northeast region and non-thermal X-rays (CXOU J171419.8-383023) at the northwest region. The X-ray spectrum of the soft diffuse is fitted with neither an ionization equilibrium nor a non-equilibrium (ionizing) plasma model, leaving saw-teeth residuals in the 1.5-3 keV energy band. The residual structures can be produced when free electrons are recombined to the K-shells of highly ionized Mg and Si ions. In fact, the X-ray spectrum is nicely fitted with a recombination-dominant plasma model. We propose a scenario that the plasma in nearly full ionized state at high temperature quickly changed to a recombining phase due to selective cooling of electrons to a lower temperature of ~0.5 keV. The spectrum of CXOU J171419.8-383023 is well explained by a simple power-law model with a photon index of 1.9, nearly equal to the typical value of pulsar wind nebulae. Since the distance is estimated to be the same as that of the soft diffuse, we infer that both the soft diffuse and CXOU J171419.8-383023 are associated with the same object, SNR G348.5+0.1.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.