Paper detail

Thermal and dynamical properties of gas accreting onto a supermassive black hole in an AGN

(Abridged) We study stability of gas accretion in Active Galactic Nuclei. Our grid based simulations cover a radial range from 0.1 to 200 pc. Here, as in previous studies by our group, we include gas radiative cooling as well as heating by a sub-Eddington X-ray source near the central supermassive black hole of 10^8 M_{\odot}. Our theoretical estimates and simulations show that for the X-ray luminosity L_X \sim 0.008 L_{Edd}, the gas is thermally and convectivelly unstable within the computational domain. In the simulations, we observe that very tiny fluctuations in an initially smooth, spherically symmetric, accretion flow, grow first linearly and then non-linearly. Consequently, an initially one-phase flow relatively quickly transitions into a two-phase/cold-hot accretion flow. For L_X = 0.015 L_{Edd} or higher, the cold clouds continue to accrete but in some regions of the hot phase, the gas starts to move outward. For L_X < 0.015 L_{Edd}, the cold phase contribution to the total mass accretion rate only moderately dominates over the hot phase contribution. This result might have some consequences for cosmological simulations of the so-called AGN feedback problem. Our simulations confirm the previous results of Barai et al. (2012) who used smoothed particle hydrodynamic simulations to tackle the same problem. However here, because we use a grid based code to solve equations in 1-D and 2-D, we are able to follow the gas dynamics at much higher spacial resolution and for longer time in comparison to the 3-D SPH simulations. One of new features revealed by our simulations is that the cold condensations in the accretion flow initially form long filaments, but at the later times, those filaments may break into smaller clouds advected outwards within the hot outflow. These simulations may serve as an attractive model for the so-called Narrow Line Region in AGN.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.