Paper detail

Thermal Activation of Methane by MgO$^+$: Temperature Dependent Kinetics, Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Statistical Modeling

The kinetics of MgO$^+$ + CH$_4$ was studied experimentally using the variable ion source, temperature adjustable selected ion flow tube (VISTA-SIFT) apparatus from 300 $-$ 600 K and computationally by running and analyzing reactive atomistic simulations. Rates and product branching fractions were determined as a function of temperature. The reaction proceeded with a rate of $k = 5.9 \pm 1.5 10^{-10}(T/300 $ K$)^{-0.5 \pm 0.2}$ cm$^3$ s$^{-1}$. MgOH$^+$ was the dominant product at all temperatures, but Mg$^+$, the co-product of oxygen-atom transfer to form methanol, was observed with a product branching fraction of $0.08 \pm 0.03 (T / 300 $ K$)^{-0.8 \pm 0.7}$. Reactive molecular dynamics simulations using a reactive force field, as well as a neural network yield rate coefficients about one order of magnitude lower. This underestimation of the rates is traced back to the multireference character of the transition state [MgOCH$_4$]$^+$. Statistical modeling of the temperature-dependent kinetics provides further insight into the reactive potential surface. The rate limiting step was found to be consistent with a four-centered activation of the C-H bond, consistent with previous calculations. The product branching was modeled as a competition between dissociation of an insertion intermediate directly after the rate-limiting transition state, and traversing a transition state corresponding to a methyl migration leading to a Mg-CH$_3$OH$^+$ complex, though only if this transition state is stabilized significantly relative to the dissociated MgOH$^+$ + CH$_3$ product channel. An alternative non-statistical mechanism is discussed, whereby a post-transition state bifurcation in the potential surface could allow the reaction to proceed directly from the four-centered TS to the Mg-CH$_3$OH$^+$ complex thereby allowing a more robust competition between the product channels.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.