Paper detail

Theory of Small $x$ Deep Inelastic Scattering NLO Evaluations, and low $Q^2$ Analysis

We calculate structure functions at small $x$ both under the assumption of a hard singularity (a power behaviour $x^{-λ}, λ$ positive, for $x\rightarrow 0$) or that of a soft-Pomeron dominated behaviour, also called double scaling limit, for the singlet component. A full next to leading order (NLO) analysis is carried for the functions $F_2, F_{\rm Glue}$ and the longitudinal one $F_L$ in $ep$ scattering, and for $x F_3$ in neutrino scattering. The results of the calculations are compared with data (HERA) in the range $x\leq 0.032, 10 gev^2\leq Q^2\leq 1 500 gev^2$. We get reasonable fits, with a chi-squared/d.o.f.$\sim 2$, for both assumptions, but none of them gives a fully satisfactory description. The results improve substantially if combining a soft and a hard component; in this case it is even possible to extend the analysis, phenomenologically, to small values of $Q^2$, $0.31 gev^2\leq Q^2\leq 8.5 gev^2$, and in the $x$ range $6\times10^{-6}\lsim x \lsim 0.04$, with the same hard plus soft Pomeron hypothesis by assuming a saturating expression for the strong coupling, $\tildeα_s(Q^2)=4π/β_0\log[(Q^2+Λ_{eff}^2)/Λ_{eff}^2]$ The description for low $Q^2$ implies self-consistent values for the parameters in the exponents of $x$. One gets, for the Regge intercepts, $α_ρ(0)=0.48$ and $α_P(0)=1.470$ [$λ=0.470$], in uncanny agreement with other determinations of these parameters, in particular the results of the large $Q^2$ fits. The fit to is so good that we may look (at large $Q^2$) for signals of a "triple Pomeron" vertex; some evidence is found.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.