Theory of Small xx Deep Inelastic Scattering NLO Evaluations, and low Q2Q^2 Analysis

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Abstract

We calculate structure functions at small xx both under the assumption of a hard singularity (a power behaviour x−λ,λx^{-λ}, λ positive, for x→0x\rightarrow 0) or that of a soft-Pomeron dominated behaviour, also called double scaling limit, for the singlet component. A full next to leading order (NLO) analysis is carried for the functions F2,FGlueF_2, F_{\rm Glue} and the longitudinal one FLF_L in epep scattering, and for xF3x F_3 in neutrino scattering. The results of the calculations are compared with data (HERA) in the range x≤0.032,10gev2≤Q2≤1500gev2x\leq 0.032, 10 gev^2\leq Q^2\leq 1 500 gev^2. We get reasonable fits, with a chi-squared/d.o.f.∼2\sim 2, for both assumptions, but none of them gives a fully satisfactory description. The results improve substantially if combining a soft and a hard component; in this case it is even possible to extend the analysis, phenomenologically, to small values of Q2Q^2, 0.31gev2≤Q2≤8.5gev20.31 gev^2\leq Q^2\leq 8.5 gev^2, and in the xx range $6\times10^{-6}\lsim x \lsim 0.04$, with the same hard plus soft Pomeron hypothesis by assuming a saturating expression for the strong coupling, α~s(Q2)=4π/β0log⁡[(Q2+Λeff2)/Λeff2]\tildeα_s(Q^2)=4π/β_0\log[(Q^2+Λ_{eff}^2)/Λ_{eff}^2] The description for low Q2Q^2 implies self-consistent values for the parameters in the exponents of xx. One gets, for the Regge intercepts, αρ(0)=0.48α_ρ(0)=0.48 and αP(0)=1.470α_P(0)=1.470 [λ=0.470λ=0.470], in uncanny agreement with other determinations of these parameters, in particular the results of the large Q2Q^2 fits. The fit to is so good that we may look (at large Q2Q^2) for signals of a "triple Pomeron" vertex; some evidence is found.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.