Paper detail

Theory and Diagnostics of Hot Star Mass Loss

Massive stars have strong stellar winds that direct their evolution through the upper Hertzsprung-Russell diagram and determine the black hole mass function. Secondly, wind strength dictates the atmospheric structure that sets the ionising flux. Thirdly, the wind directly intervenes with the stellar envelope structure, which is decisive for both single star and binary evolution, affecting predictions for gravitational wave events. Key findings of current hot-star research include: * The traditional line-driven wind theory is being updated with Monte Carlo and co-moving frame computations, revealing a rich multi-variate behaviour of the mass-loss rate dM/dt in terms of M, L, Eddington Gamma, Teff , and chemical composition Z. Concerning the latter, dM/dt is shown to depend on the iron (Fe) opacity, making Wolf-Rayet populations, and gravitational wave events dependent on host galaxy Z. * On top of smooth mass-loss behaviour, there are several transitions in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, involving bi-stability jumps around Fe recombination temperatures, leading to quasi-stationary episodic, and not necessarily eruptive, Luminous Blue Variable and pre-SN mass loss. * Moreover, there are kinks. At 100 Solar Masses, a high Gamma mass-loss transition implies that hydrogen-rich very massive stars have higher mass-loss rates than commonly considered. At the other end of the mass spectrum, low-mass stripped helium stars no longer appear as Wolf-Rayet stars, but as optically-thin stars. These stripped stars, in addition to very massive stars, are two newly identified sources of ionising radiation that could play a key role in local star formation as well as at high-redshift.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.