Paper detail

Theoretical study of the implications of causality when inferring metamaterial properties

The usual procedures to extract effective refractive indices for negative-index metamaterials are complicated by branching ambiguities in the inverse cosine function. The existing methods to eliminate ambiguities either involve calculations with varying geometries which are inherently flawed, as metamaterial properties depend strongly on geometry, or are more subjective as one must inspect and select branches to yield effec- tive parameters as a continuous function of frequency. We propose that the Kramers-Kronig relations, which hold for negative-index materials, naturally guide the selection of the proper branches, and in fact predict negative refractive index where other extraction procedures alone might not. The experimental realization of high quality negative-index materials requires a robust and reliable index retrieval procedure; the combined extraction/Kramers-Kronig retrieval can be used to design optimal metama- terials in a simple, systemmatic, and general manner.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.