Paper detail

Theoretical Study of Defects in Cu$_3$SbSe$_4$: Search for Optimum Dopants for Enhancing Thermoelectric Properties

Cu$_3$SbSe$_4$ is a promising thermoelectric material due to high thermopower ($>400\ μ$V/K) at 300K and higher. Although it has a simple crystal structure derived from zinc blende structure, previous work has shown that the physics of band gap formation is quite subtle due to the importance of active lone pair (5$s^2$) of Sb and the non-local exchange interaction between these and Se 5$p$ electrons. Since for any application of semiconductors understanding the properties of defects is essential, we discuss the results of a systematic study of several point defects in Cu$_3$SbSe$_4$ including vacancies and substitutions for each of the components. First principles calculations using density functional theory show that among variety of possible dopants, $p$-type doping can be done by substituting Sb with group $IV$ elements including Sn, Ge, Pb and Ti and $n$-type doping can be done by replacing Cu by Mg, Zn. Doping at the Se site appears to be rather difficult. Electronic structure calculations also suggest that the $p$-type behavior seen in nominally pure Cu$_3$SbSe$_4$ is most likely due to Cu vacancy rather than Se vacancy.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.